Another one down!
1965 was picked pretty much at random, but my expectations were pretty high - how did it do? Yeah, not bad at all. I'd struggle to say there were too many albums I loved but there were very few I hated and a lot that were interesting, even educational. There was also more variety than I was expecting - the Beatles/Stones kinda sound was certainly the most common but we had a fair few trips away from that core. We also have to bear in mind that a fair few of the classic albums of the year had already been claimed by Rolling Stone - if they hadn't we would have had a LOT of Bob Dylan this year. A couple had also been claimed by our visits to '61 and '65. And, to no-one's surprise, the ownership ratio was a big fat 0%. Looking at the best selling albums of the year, we're back to relying on the dubious information from bestsellingalbums.org and it tells us The Beatles were at the top with Beatles For Sale , which was released in December '64, was #1 for nine w...